Pranit More Rs 370 Biryani Controversy Explained — The Comment That Started It, The Response That Escalated It

The Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy has taken over Indian social media in the past few days — and it shows no signs of slowing down. Notably, what began as a crowdwork interaction at a live stand-up comedy show has snowballed into a nationwide debate about consent, gender attitudes, comedy accountability, and the real-world consequences of what people say in public. Furthermore, comedian Pranit More has deactivated his Instagram account amid the mounting backlash, while the man whose comment triggered the entire controversy has reportedly lost his job.

Furthermore, the controversy drew reactions from major influencers, celebrities, and social media users. People were sharply divided. Some saw the incident as deeply problematic. Others felt the backlash had gone too far. Additionally, The controversy dragged Zomato in over a viral fake screenshot, forcing the food delivery giant to publicly deny any involvement.

Therefore, here is the complete story of the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy — explained from the beginning, with the full timeline, all reactions, and the key questions this incident has raised.

🔗 Source: Deccan Herald — Rs 370 Biryani Consent Controversy Explained

Pranit More Rs 370 Biryani Controversy — Quick Facts

What Happened — The Rs 370 Biryani Comment Explained

Step 1 — The Crowdwork Interaction

During a live stand-up comedy show, comedian Pranit More was doing what is known as crowdwork — interacting directly with audience members to create spontaneous, improvised comedy. Notably, an audience member named Himanshu Jangra, who worked at a Gurugram-based company called Starvik Design, shared a story about a date he had been on.

Specifically, Himanshu told the crowd that he had taken a woman out on a date and spent Rs 370 on a chicken biryani for her. Furthermore, he used the phrase ‘wasool toh karunga’ — implying that because he had spent money on her, he was entitled to something in return. Consequently, many viewers interpreted this as a direct reference to sexual entitlement — the belief that spending money on a woman gives a man rights over her body.

Step 2 — Pranit More’s Response on Stage

The second part of the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy involves how the comedian responded to the audience member’s statement on stage. According to multiple reports and social media discussions, Pranit More’s reaction to the comment — rather than clearly pushing back against the problematic attitude — many saw it as validating or amplifying it for comedic effect.

As a result, when the clip went viral on social media, people directed the backlash not just at Himanshu Jangra for making the original comment, but also at Pranit More for the way he engaged with it on stage. Moreover, critics argued that a public platform carries responsibility. Normalising harmful statements through laughter — even in comedy — can reinforce those attitudes.

🔗 Read More: India.com — Pranit More Controversy Explained In Full

The Viral Backlash — Social Media Reaction

Once the clip spread across Instagram, Twitter/X, and YouTube, the response was immediate and intense. Furthermore, the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy became one of the top trending topics on Indian social media within hours of the clip going viral.

What People Said Online:

• Many users condemned Himanshu Jangra’s statement as a reflection of a deeply problematic ‘transactional’ mindset towards women
• Several users pointed out that spending money on a date does not — under any circumstances — create any obligation or entitlement on the other person
• Critics of Pranit More argued that his comedic engagement with the comment on stage normalised a harmful attitude instead of challenging it
• Supporters of Pranit More argued the backlash went too far and that crowdwork comedy involves engaging with whatever audience members say
• Others drew a line between the audience member’s attitude being problematic and labelling him a ‘potential rapist’ — calling the latter an overreach
• The hashtag ‘Biryani is dinner not consent’ began trending on social media platforms

Celebrity & Influencer Reactions:

Notably, several prominent influencers and public figures weighed in on the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy. Furthermore, names including Uorfi Javed, Kusha Kapila, and Dolly Singh were among those who responded to the viral clip, further amplifying the debate. Consequently, the controversy moved beyond a niche comedy audience and entered mainstream public discourse.

Real-World Consequences — Jobs Lost and Accounts Deleted

Himanshu Jangra Loses His Job

One of the most significant real-world consequences of the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy was that Himanshu Jangra — the Gurugram man who made the original biryani comment — Starvik Design terminated his employment immediately. Notably, this happened after social media users identified him and began tagging his employer in posts about the viral clip.

His termination reignited a fierce debate about online mob justice. Some felt losing his job was fair, but others warned that viral pile-ons setting a precedent is dangerous.

Moreover, this aspect of the controversy drew significant attention to the real-world power of social media pile-ons.

Pranit More Deactivates Instagram

As the backlash against him intensified, comedian Pranit More deactivated his Instagram account on June 10, 2026. Consequently, the public could no longer access his social media at the height of the controversy. Furthermore, this move itself generated significant discussion — with some seeing it as an acknowledgement of wrongdoing and others viewing it as a response to what they described as unfair harassment.

Additionally, prior to deactivating his account, Pranit More had posted he posted a clarification or response to the controversy. However, the response itself drew further criticism from many who felt it did not adequately address the core issue of how the comment was handled on stage.

Pranit More’s Clarification — What He Said

In his clarification post, Pranit More addressed the backlash but stopped short of a direct apology. Many viewers felt the response lacked accountability. The post itself added fuel to the already raging controversy.

Who Is Pranit More?

• Born: March 2, 1991, Thrissur, Kerala
• Profession: Stand-up comedian, YouTube content creator, TV personality
• YouTube: 2 Million subscribers, 774+ million views
• Known For: Observational comedy rooted in Indian middle-class life
• Stand-up Specials: Baap Ko Mat Sikha (2023), Back Bencher (2024)
• Reality TV: Bigg Boss Season 19 contestant (2025)
• Education: MBA from Welingkar Institute, Mumbai

Zomato Gets Dragged In — The Fake Notification

In addition to the main controversy, Zomato was drawn into the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy through a viral fake screenshot. Specifically, a fabricated Zomato push notification began circulating on social media that referenced the biryani incident in a supposedly humorous way. Furthermore, users widely shared the fake notification and many users believed it to be real.

However, Zomato quickly and publicly denied any connection to the screenshot. Notably, the company posted a clarification on Twitter/X stating clearly that Zomato never sent that notification — it was completely fabricated. Consequently, Zomato’s quick response Users widely praised Zomato for its quick response — and even drew some lighthearted praise for how the brand handled the situation.

🔗 Source: Zomato Official Clarification on Twitter/X

The Bigger Debate — Consent, Comedy & Accountability

Is Comedy an Excuse?

At the heart of the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy is a question that has come up repeatedly in Indian comedy discourse: does the label of ‘comedy’ exempt a performer from accountability for the content they engage with? Furthermore, critics argue that stand-up comedians have a responsibility. Those with large platforms must not normalise harmful attitudes. This applies even in a live crowdwork setting.

On the other hand, defenders of Pranit More argue that crowdwork by its very nature is spontaneous and that a comedian cannot always predict or control what an audience member will say. Moreover, they contend that the primary responsibility lies with Himanshu Jangra. The comedian only reacted to it in real time

The ‘Transactional’ Mindset Problem:

What This Controversy Revealed About Indian Society

Additionally, many commentators used the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy to highlight what they described as a pervasive ‘transactional mindset’ in Indian dating culture — the belief that spending money on someone creates an obligation or entitlement. Consequently, several social media threads turned the incident into a broader discussion about consent education, gender dynamics, and respectful relationships.

Online Mob Justice — Has It Gone Too Far?

The firing of Himanshu Jangra sparked serious debate. Many questioned whether internet-driven job losses are justice or mob punishment. Moreover, legal experts and social commentators weighed in on whether the long-term consequences of viral pile-ons are proportionate to the original offence.

🔗 Reference: Wikipedia — Pranit More Profile

Conclusion — Pranit More Rs 370 Biryani Controversy

In conclusion, the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy is far more than a viral comedy clip. Furthermore, it has sparked a necessary national conversation about consent, accountability, the responsibilities of public figures, and the power of social media to generate real-world consequences. Moreover, the incident raises important questions about where the line between comedy and harmful normalisation lies.

The ripple effects of a single 30-second clip have been far-reaching. Himanshu lost his job. Pranit deactivated Instagram. Zomato issued a public clarification. Therefore, whatever side of the debate one stands on, the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy serves as a powerful reminder that words spoken in public — whether on stage or in an audience — carry real weight in the social media age. Stay tuned to Mirrorly.in for all the latest trending news and social media controversies!

📖 Also Read: Top 10 Bollywood Actresses 2026 — Most Popular and Talented Stars Right Now

Frequently Asked Questions — Pranit More Biryani Controversy

Q1. What is the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy?

The Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy refers to a viral crowdwork clip from comedian Pranit More’s live stand-up show, in which an audience member named Himanshu Jangra claimed that spending Rs 370 on a woman’s biryani entitled him to something in return. The clip sparked a nationwide debate about consent, gender attitudes, and comedian accountability.

Q2. Who is Himanshu Jangra?

Himanshu Jangra is a Gurugram-based professional who was employed at a company called Starvik Design. After the viral clip spread on social media, users identified him and tagged his employer — following which His company Starvik Design fired him from his job

Q3. Why did Pranit More deactivate his Instagram?

Pranit More deactivated his Instagram account on June 10, 2026, amid mounting backlash over his on-stage response to the audience member’s comment. He had previously posted a clarification, but that response itself drew further criticism from many users who felt it did not adequately address the issue.

Q4. Was Zomato involved in the controversy?

No. A fake Zomato push notification screenshot referencing the biryani incident went viral on social media. However, Zomato quickly denied any involvement and publicly clarified on Twitter/X that the notification was completely fabricated and had not been sent by the company.

Q5. Who is Pranit More?

Pranit More is a popular Indian stand-up comedian and YouTube content creator with over 2 million subscribers and 774+ million views. He is known for observational comedy rooted in Indian middle-class life and was a contestant on Bigg Boss Season 19 in 2025. His stand-up specials include Baap Ko Mat Sikha (2023) and Back Bencher (2024).

Q6. Are comedians responsible for audience comments during crowdwork?

This is the central debate the controversy raised. Critics argue that public platforms carry responsibility and that engaging with harmful attitudes for laughs normalises them. Supporters of Pranit More, however, contend that crowdwork is spontaneous and that comedians cannot always control or predict what audience members will say on stage.

Q7. Does spending money on someone give consent?

Absolutely not. Spending money on someone — whether it is a Rs 370 biryani or anything else — does not create any form of physical or sexual entitlement. Consent must always be explicit, voluntary, and mutual. This is the core message that emerged from the Pranit More Rs 370 biryani controversy.